During the last four months of weekly protesting, I have
noticed that 99.99% of the people who yell obscenities at me or give me the
finger are men. For three weeks straight, a man in a black BMW slowed down just
to give me the finger. Why?
Obviously, these men have a First Amendment right to disagree
with my Free Speech. I ignore them, but I still wonder why a grown
man would give the finger to a “little old lady” holding a $1.50 sign from the used-to-be-dollar
store? I wanted to understand so I began reading research (sources listed at the end). Here are a few
reasons I discovered about why I am getting the finger.
Political or ideological opposition. A person may
give the middle finger to show complete contempt for my cause, especially if
they view my message as unreasonable, damaging, or counter to their own
beliefs. By giving me the finger men can silently signal their strong
disapproval and hostility toward me.
A sense of belittlement. A person might feel that my
protest is a challenge to their way of life, authority, or sense of social
order. The gesture is used to belittle me and my cause.
But why so many men? I
had a theory but decided to see if there was any research on why so many men
respond with aggressive words and gestures to protesters. I came across a
theory called Precarious manhood (PM).
Aggressive compensation: To reassert their masculine
status, threatened men may engage in compensatory behaviors, including acts of
aggression, dominance, or risk-taking. In the political arena, this can
manifest as political aggression.
Political aggression: This is defined as the
endorsement of political stances, policies, candidates, or strategies that
signal strength, toughness, and force. Politics provides a socially acceptable
and highly visible way for men to display their masculinity vicariously.
Reinforcing masculinity: Its use in a confrontation
with a protesting group or single protester (me) may be a way of asserting
dominance or toughness.
“Taken together, our findings support the notion that
men who are likely to doubt their masculinity may support aggressive policies,
politicians, and parties, possibly as a means of affirming their manhood,”
The studies' authors emphasize that their results do not
suggest that precarious manhood is only relevant when it comes to
aggressive policies or support for the political right. They propose that future
research should consider whether PM shows itself among the political left.
In the meantime, I will “keep on keepin’ on” expressing my First Amendment rights knowing, for whatever reason, some man will most probably give me the finger.
DiMuccio SH, Knowles ED. Precarious Manhood Predicts Support for Aggressive Policies and Politicians. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jul;47(7):1169-1187. doi: 10.1177/0146167220963577. Epub 2020 Oct 13. PMID: 33048007.
Vandello, Joseph A., and Jennifer K. Bosson. “Hard Won and Easily Lost: A Review and Synthesis of Theory and Research on Precarious Manhood.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity, vol. 14, no. 2, Apr. 2013, pp. 101–113.
Wintemute, GJ, Velasquez, B, Robinson, S, Tomsich, EA, Wright, MA, Shev, A. “PREPRINT: The MAGA Movement and Political Violence in 2024.” Centers for Violence Prevention, 25 June 2025, cvp.ucdavis.edu/research/preprint-maga-movement-and-political-violence-2024. Accessed 21 Sept. 2025.
No comments:
Post a Comment