Non-fiction: Science/Medicine/Health
Allergic: Our Irritated Bodies in a Changing World by Theresa MacPhail
Several weeks ago I experienced a runny nose that flowed like a waterfall and eyes that felt like a handful of sand had been tossed into them. I was miserable. I thought, “Did I finally catch COVID?” Two negative COVID tests and one doctor’s visit later, I learned it was just my seasonal allergies. I did not have any allergies as a child. I first experienced allergic reactions as an adult when we moved to Virginia and I encountered yellow pine pollen. No big deal, just a lot of tissues. So why have my allergies gotten worse years later?
My doctor explained that the recent “up and down” in temperature was causing an increase in tree pollen and, in addition to that, smoke particulates from wildfires in Canada were collecting pollen grains which were then being inhaled by people. I was one of thousands of people suffering. She went on to mention that many people do not “outgrow” allergies – they get worse as we age. Thankfully, I received a prescription for a nasal spray and I felt much better. As a result of this experience, I wanted to learn more about allergies.
This book is detailed and informative! It explains how environmental and lifestyle changes have led to an increase in allergies. It also helped me to understand my blood test results. I couldn’t describe it better than the publisher so here is the publisher’s description: “Hay fever. Peanut allergies. Eczema. Either you have an allergy or you know someone who does. Billions of people worldwide—an estimated 30 percent to 40 percent of the global population—have some form of allergy. Even more concerning is that fact that over the last decade the number of people diagnosed with an allergy has been steadily increasing, placing an ever-growing medical burden on individuals, families, communities, and healthcare systems.
Fiction: Mystery
Brat Farrar by Josephine Tey
Brat Farrar enters the Ashby family posing as Patrick Ashby, the heir to the family's sizable fortune. Brat has been carefully coached by an actor who knows the Ashby family intimately. He instructs Brat on Patrick's mannerism's, appearance, and every significant detail of Patrick's early life, up until he is 13. At that time he disappeared and was thought to have drowned himself although his body was never found. Eight years after his disappearance, now 21 year-old “Patrick” arrives just in time to claim his inheritance.
Of course the Ashby family is startled at his reappearance. Is he really Patrick or a greedy impostor? Is he really the long missing heir? Brat/Patrick has all the right answers and knows all about his earlier life. His polite mannerisms and physical appearance are spot on. Most important of all, he knows and loves horses - the clincher. It seems as if Brat is going to pull off this most incredible deception until old secrets emerge that jeopardize his plan and his life. Does a murderer live within the walls of the Ashby’s idyllic English horse farm?
What I found most unique about this story is that Brat is supposed to be the bad guy in this story. But Brat’s character is very compelling. He grew up in an orphanage and he has never had a family of his own. When the opportunity to become part of a family presents itself, Brat’s desire for a sense of belonging and a place to call home prove to be a stronger temptation then the lure of money.
Science Fiction
The End of Men by Christina Sweeney-Baird
Initially, I was immensely intrigued by this book but by the end of the book I felt somewhat ambivalent about it.
Written before the COVID Pandemic, and published in 1921, the author imagines a global pandemic. This pandemic affects only men. The virus has a 90% fatality rate after only a few days of infection, regardless of age or ethnicity. It also has a huge infection rate, made much worse by women who are asymptomatic carriers. The women are infected extremely easily but they don’t get sick and then they carry the infection – spreading it indefinitely.
Each chapter presents the point of view of a different woman: a college professor; a stay-at-home mother, a doctor from the emergency department, a civil servant, a virologist from CDC, etc. Honestly, there were too many characters! I had to constantly refresh my memory on who-was-who. Plus, the characters were mostly North American or European middle-class women. What was going on in Africa or South America? How about women living in poverty?
There were two main characters. One was a Scottish doctor who single-handedly realized that there was a pandemic after treating a few patients in the ER. She was ignored by her supervisor who was, guess what, a man. Then she is the only person who decides to track down the origin of the pandemic virus – highly doubtful. Too much of a “superwoman,” not realistic, in my opinion.
Then there was the Canadian researcher who is working to develop a vaccine. She “beats” all the other scientists in the world and successfully creates the vaccine. However, she will not share the vaccine formula with the world, they must purchase a license. Her public reason is that production quality control must be maintained. Privately, she wants the recognition and money – which she gets. Eventually she is awarded the Nobel Prize but is upset that she must share it with two other scientists who identified the virus and created the test to diagnose the plague. I didn’t like this character – too much of a “bitch” but probably realistic.
Obviously, there are going to be huge societal changes if millions of men all over the planet are dead. With almost all the men dead, who would take over their jobs? There is a scramble to rebuild the workforce, especially in professions formerly dominated by men; women find themselves at the helm of garbage collecting, electrical repair, military service, policy-making, global leadership. Women are assigned jobs by their governments. But what about the jobs the women had before the pandemic – who will do that work?
There is immense political upheaval. For example, China has dissolved into twelve democratic states because the male-dominated army and Communist Party was ravaged by the virus, allowing rebel parties to take charge of governance.
How will the world’s population be replenished? Again, governments create a “lottery” for artificial insemination. Simplistic solutions to complex problems.
Non-fiction: History/Humor
Humans: A Brief History of How We F*cked It All Up by Tom Phillips
Author Tom Phillips studied Archaeology, Anthropology and the History and Philosophy of Science at Cambridge University. He has worked as a journalist, a humor writer, and as the editorial director of BuzzFeed UK. Phillips researched extensively to find Humans unique stories of humanity's biggest mistakes, but he tells them with ironic humor and a lot of f-bombs.
Humans is divided into chapters on our brains (going over confirmation bias, the Dunning-Kruger effect, and other ways that we convince ourselves we're right when we're wrong), the mistakes of the Agricultural Revolution and the domestication/resettling of animals, the rise of leaders (and all the horrible ways they have taken advantage of their positions, no matter the political system), the evils of colonization and war, mistakes of diplomacy, and the unintended consequences of technological breakthroughs.
There's some very pointed commentary on the kinds of things we just can't seem to learn and reading it in today's political climate gives these repeated failures greater emphasis.
Speculative Non-fiction: Politics/Sociology
The Next Civil War: Dispatches from the American Future by Stephen Marche
This is a disturbing (and depressing!) speculative nonfiction book that takes a fiercely divided America and imagines our collapse. Using sophisticated predictive models and nearly two hundred interviews with experts—civil war scholars, military leaders, law enforcement officials, secret service agents, agricultural specialists, environmentalists, war historians, and political scientists—journalist Stephen Marche predicts the terrifying future collapse that so many of us do not want to see unfolding in front of our eyes.
Dispensing entirely with the question of whether the U.S. will experience a civil war (like political scientist Barbara Walter did in How Civil Wars Start) in order to focus on why, how, and where one could break out, Marche depicts five near-future scenarios in which the United States either collapses into a vicious armed conflict or breaks apart entirely:
On a small two-lane bridge in a rural county that loathes the federal government, the US Army uses lethal force to end a standoff with hard-right, anti-government “patriots.”
Inside an ordinary diner, a disaffected young man with a handgun takes aim at the American president stepping in for an impromptu photo-op, and a bullet splits the hyper-partisan country into violently opposed mourners and revelers.
A mammoth hurricane erases New York City from the map, while worsening drought shrinks the nation’s food supply, triggering a systemic collapse.
A dirty-bomb attack on the United States Capitol explodes into a violent free-for-all.
A secession of states resulting in four smaller countries: Cascadia (California, Oregon, Washington); the Republic of Texas; USA of the South + Prairie states; and USA of New England + Midwest states.
Some of the scenarios are not overwhelmingly convincing. I don’t know how the next civil war, should it come, will begin, but I highly doubt it will be precipitated by “agents” of the Federal Highway Administration. Would half the country really celebrate a presidential assassin as a “heroic resister?” Some of these scenarios may seem implausible, but so would have the idea, three years ago, that if a deadly virus swept through the country, killing a million people, a large percentage of the population would effectively side with the virus. So I think the speculative scenarios, created from known facts, aren’t much more “insane” than our current political/social situation - only more developed and projected further into the future.
Without a doubt there is a well funded, “loud & proud” and armed movement that has a fundamentally different conception of our nation than do other Americans. How do you think they would answer this question: Do some Americans have a special and privileged status as compared to other Americans? What is your answer?
Non-fiction: Law/History/Politics
Nine Black Robes: Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences by Joan Biskupic
In May I read American Crusade: How the Supreme Court Is Weaponizing Religious Freedom by Andrew L. Seidel. In his book, Seidel described how a hallowed legal protection, freedom of religion, has been turned into a tool to advance privilege and impose the Christian religion on others (Christian Nationalism). I wondered, “Who are these Justices and how are they doing this?”
Fortunately, Joan Biskupic just published this book. She has reported on the Supreme Court since 1989. Previously the Supreme Court reporter for The Washington Post, Biskupic is the legal affairs correspondent for USA Today, a frequent panelist on PBS’s Washington Week, and the author of Sandra Day O’Connor: How the First Woman on the Supreme Court Became Its Most Influential Justice. Obviously Biskupic has the breadth (34 years) and depth (extensive written and verbal analysis) to write on this topic!
To be sure if you read or watch the news, you are already familiar with the historical court rulings. However, this book provides a well-researched and comprehensive look at the Supreme Court from the period following Antonin Scalia's death in February 2016 (when the Senate chose not to take up President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland because it was “too close” to a presidential election), to the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September 2020 and the confirmation of her replacement just days before a presidential election, and through last year's Supreme Court term.
One of the most enlightening aspects of the book is that the author is careful to detail the prior legal experience of the court's members. Most of the members of the court have spent very little time doing what lawyers around the country do every day - representing clients, conducting discovery proceedings, conducting trials, arguing motions and appeals, dealing with adversaries and skeptical judges.
Instead, they come from the narrow class of elites who attend Ivy League law schools, become clerks for federal appellate judges and Supreme Court judges, go to work in a Democratic or Republican administration in a political job, and then get appointed to the federal bench, not so much because their experience makes them qualified to preside over trials or appellate arguments, but because these are necessary stepping stones to a position where they can continue their political advocacy as a circuit court judge or Supreme Court justice. For example, Justice Barrett spent less than two years as a low level associate actually practicing law. She didn't try a case nor argue an appeal or conduct a deposition. Yet, she followed the path with the “correct” politics - now Barrett will be a Supreme Court justice for life. Given this path, it is no surprise that under-qualified Supreme Court justices continue to advocate for political priorities on the court. It is what they were trained to do and what they have always done. It would be foolish to expect them to change especially when they receive “perks” from political supporters such as expense-paid vacations.
Finally, there are 9 Justices: 6 are Catholic; 2 are Protestant (However, Gorsuch was raised Catholic and is now Episcopalian) and 1 is Jewish. Is it any wonder the “majority” overthrew Roe v. Wade? Diversity of thought is important when considering the legal rights of ALL citizens. Our Supreme Court should reflect the diversity, in all aspects, of our citizens.
Nine Black Robes exposes and debunks the false claim, made over and over again by Chief Justice Roberts, that the court is not a political body. Reform is desperately needed, whether in the form of term limits or a different method of selecting justices. Otherwise the legitimacy that has been lost, as shown in this book, can never be regained.
Fiction: Mystery/Thriller
The Plot by Jean Hanff Korelitz
Jacob Finch Bonner wrote a reasonably successful novel. But then he was unable to produce anything as successful after that. So he is “reduced” to becoming a Professor in a little-known Masters in Fine Arts program in Vermont. Years later, Bonner appropriates a plot developed by one of his students, now deceased. While alive, the student had bragged to Bonner that his plot was a guaranteed best seller. So, upon learning of the student's death, Bonner decides to use the student's plot to write his new book. The title of Bonner’s book is Crib – but he is not talking about a baby bed, he is referring to another definition of crib - “to pilfer or steal, especially to plagiarize (another's writings or ideas).
World-wide success and accolades pour down on him. Then at the pinnacle of all the adulation, Bonner receives an anonymous email calling him a thief. Bonner lives in fear that he will be exposed as a fraud and thief. In order to maintain his literary reputation, Bonner makes a series of terrible decisions in order to discover who is sending him the threatening emails. Events spiral out of control ...
I read several good reviews of this book before I decided to read it. Although most reviews warn that the book has a slow beginning, they also assure the reader that it gets suspenseful, thrilling. If you are “into” the publishing world and self-absorbed authors, or enjoy a good mystery, you may find The Plot a satisfying read but thrilling? The mystery is solved in the end, but I could see it coming long before then.
Memoir: Book Club Selection
Solito by Javier Zamora
This is an incredibly detailed chronicle of Zamora's 1999 3,000-mile journey from his small town in El Salvador — where he spent his childhood without his mom and dad, who had already made their way to the U.S. — through Guatemala and Mexico, and eventually across the U.S. border.
Zamora, 9 years old, traveled alone but in the company of the coyote, Don Dago, and a small group of strangers who are also trying to make their way to the United States. He knows he'll have to run and jump and cross rivers, but nothing could have prepared him for perilous journey he had embarked on, or the fact that the "trip" he expected to be two weeks long turned into two months of survival. While the events could have easily lead Zamora to write about the pains and dangers of undocumented migration or the way awful immigration policies have created a dangerous system, a lot of the focus is placed on the humanity and people he encountered on his journey.
Non-fiction: Psychology
Stumbling on Happiness by Daniel Todd Gilbert
The author is the Harvard College Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. He has won numerous awards for his teaching and research—from the Guggenheim Fellowship to the American Psychological Association's Distinguished Scientific Award for an Early Career Contribution to Psychology.
The title is Stumbling On Happiness, not Stumbling Onto Happiness. This not a self-help book. Rather, it delineates the many decision-making errors we make and how our minds trick us into choosing things that might not lead us to happiness in the long run. It's basically about decision-making, risk aversion, and blind spots in our predictive abilities. Which, of course, have huge implications for happiness: if we decide money will make us happy and devote our lives to making as much money as possible, things are unlikely to end as hoped.
Gilbert incorporates psychological research, philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, sociology, behavioral economics, and more to strengthen his points. Some of his ideas I found interesting include:
our brains construct experiences based on biased memories rather then objective facts;
we suck at predicting our future happiness because our present state influences us so much;
certain societal ideas like having millions of dollars or having a large home continue to circulate even when we have many actual instances that demonstrate that they do not create happiness;
our neurological structures that allow us to store and re-imagine information may serve us all too well, creating a persuasive yet fundamentally distorted picture of what we want and why we want it.
Science Fiction: Post-apocalyptic
Warday by Whitley Strieber
This book, written in 1984, is about an event that didn't happen, but very well could have and is still possible.
The US and USSR have a limited nuclear war - Warday. In this case, "limited" means the world didn't blow up completely. New York, San Antonio, Washington D.C. and most of North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana have been turned into craters. Radioactive fallout is drifting over the landscape contaminating crops but there are survivors. Because the nuclear war was limited, Asia and most of Europe are unaffected by the exchange – at least initially!
Due to EMP bursts in the atmosphere, the entire technological infrastructure in the USA is gone. Transportation, including cars and airplanes, will not work. All the airplanes that were in flight when the nuclear exchange began, crashed. Electrical substations are destroyed. Computers and telecommunications are useless. Millions of survivors of the initial nuclear blasts, even those who experienced neither the blast nor the fallout, eventually succumb to a flu epidemic and a famine. Yet, there are still some survivors. How would you survive?
Five years after Warday, two authors make a trip (mostly on old trains and buses without electronics) around America to see what has become of the country. The entire USA government was destroyed, along with all the financial institutions, companies, schools, hospital, etc. Japan and Great Britain have sent military, technological, agricultural and medical assistance to the land that was once a great world power. What would American survivors’ lives be like?
Post-apocalyptic fiction is always a fascinating thought exercise and this book is a real workout! Using a first-person journalistic approach, the author includes “official” documents and survivor “interviews” which make Warday all the more realistic.
Even though this book was written in 1984, it's easy to extrapolate how our country is a house of cards based on a shaky technological base. Pull out a card or two and the whole thing comes tumbling down. Add to that recent events in Europe including a dictator with nuclear capabilities, and you have a recipe for many nightmares to come.
An excellent, fast-paced but not-sensationalized picture of a possible nuclear exchange and its consequences.